India Wants Real-Time Data from BlackBerrys

An India official has been quoted as saying, “for example if two terrorists are negotiating a strike, you can’t expect us to wait for 10 days,” and while that certainly is a valid point, why can’t India just hack into the BlackBerrys themselves? I am pretty sure privacy laws don’t apply anywhere anymore when suspected terrorists are involved and the BlackBerry platform certainly isn’t unbreakable. Is this a case where India wants to do things in a more legal fashion or is the country’s intelligence services too far behind widely available technology to just hack the devices themselves?
I am certain the NSA or any leading computer security company can hack into the BlackBerry and decrypt everything pretty quickly (especially non-BES BlackBerrys). I still lean towards the idea that India is headed down the path of China and just wants to censor everyone and everything that it deems unacceptable. Did not read about that? Yeah, India’s freedom of speech makes exceptions in the public order, decency and morality categories and the government has no problem telling Google and other Internet content providers to remove stuff or just blocking things themselves. The same goes for the rest of the countries considering banning the BlackBerry.
Regardless of whether or not India bans the BlackBerry or gets the keys to decrypt all of the information on them, terrorists aren’t really going to care. They will just use third party encryption that is just as or even more secure. It is the consumers wanting to voice their opinions and widen their minds that will be hurt out of all of this.
Tags: BlackBerry, BlackBerry ban, encryption, RIM
Google is NSA
The fallacy of knowledge is the greatest single hurtle towards truth.
You are not free.
The internet never was.
Internet = privatized intelligence gathering net.
We don’t call it the NET because of what it figuratively looks like. We call it the NET because of what it does. Kinda like INTERPOL.
When a military or government application gets put into private hands, it is no longer held to account by the people.
This “partnership” is a propaganda smokescreen, designed to reinforce the idea that all of this cyber security is not aimed at you, when it has been the whole time. Kinda like homeland security, the patriot act, military commissions act, as well as many other thing said to be for your own and the general public’s well fair. Its not security when they build fences around you. It is not security when they spy on you.
All you have to know is the answer to a few of questions.
WHO IS THE GOVERNMENT MOST SCARED OF?
WHO BENEFITS?
WHAT WOULD HITLER, STALIN, POL POT, MAO, HAVE DONE WITH THE INTERNET?
[Reply]