‘Gingerbread’ Might Just be Android 2.3
Google’s coming Android update—‘Gingerbread’—might not the version 3.0 or even version 2.5 like we all thought. Instead, someone from inside the company has mentioned a “major release” with 2.3 as the version number. Hmm. This really shouldn’t be that big of a surprise since so far what has been confirmed in Gingerbread has not been as big as the changes from 2.1 to 2.2 were.
What is worrying however is that Android 2.1 is still on plenty of users’ smartphones. The update from 2.1 to 2.2 brings Adobe Flash Player 10.1 to the platform along with lots of little performance tweaks. Odds are that at least a few people reading this are still stuck at 2.1 ‘Eclair’ and have not yet even had a chance to ‘Froyo’ it up with Android 2.2. What gives here?
The strength of Google’s Android platform is also its weakness. Because smartphone operating systems are so reliant on the hardware powering them—at least far more so than PC’s running Windows, Linux or Mac OS X—and vice versa, the business model of one company building the operating system and another building the hardware for the operating system to run on has problems. Sure, it means there are far, far more smartphones out there powered by Android than there would be if Google itself produced the phones or even if one or two manufacturers were hand selected by Google to build them. But it also means that users of Android are reliant on their smartphone’s manufacturer to bring them the updates that Google produces.
Look at the Galaxy S series of smartphones from Samsung. Android 2.2 ‘Froyo’ is delayed until sometime near the end of November for customers in the US and most of the world. Android is all about features and minimizing the cost of production for smartphone manufacturers (yes, they do have to figure in the price of building and updating an operating system when they build any phone). The fact that I know smartphone users who are running Android 2.1 and still do not have access to Adobe Flash content is disheartening. What’s the point of choosing Android over iOS without Flash? Yes, the option of buying an Android phone with a physical keyboard is a tempting one but really, would you rather have an Android with a keyboard and no Flash than an iPhone with superior touchscreen text input and no Flash? Decisions, decisions.
Let me know what you think. Gingerbread going to be the update everyone needs or just a temporary stop-gap until Android 2.5 or 3.0? Still mad that you don’t have Flash on your Android 2.1 smartphone?
Tags: android os, Android 2.3, Android 2.1, Google, Android 2.2
Apple iPhone will be dwarfed by Android 3.0 release: Google Voice, Google Talk, Google Music, Cloud Computing, Video Chat, open source code and lots of phone makers building phones for the Android OS. Google Voice alone has the potential to reduce Skype to a small player and turn the phone carriers upside down. Even iPhone users will end up using Google for Voice, maps, Earth, etc. Google Music will offer services that iTunes today can only dream about. Do some research about what Google has coming. You should also check out the stats at the end of the article linked below. As you can see, iPhone is already less popular than Android and it will only get more pronounced. Apple is now 14.7% of world market and will drop to 10.9% by 2014. Android is now 16.3% and will rise to 24.6% in the same time. If you use Macs, then have fun with the simplicity and integration of the iPhone. But if you are (rightly) concerned about being limited by the many Apple rules and restrictions…do what I did: Buy Android for freedom.
technolog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/09/07/5061322-smart-phone-future-wont-be-dominated-by-anyone-study-says
[Reply]
“Still mad that you don’t have Flash on your Android 2.1 smartphone?”
What are you talking about? I’ve got a Galaxy S and have Flash Lite… certainly not the same as the full desktop Flash experience but better than nothing.
“would you rather have an Android with a keyboard and no Flash than an iPhone with superior touchscreen text input and no Flash?”
Again, what are you talking about??!! I’ve got Swype which is far superior than your old-fashioned text input.
Do iPhone users still believe we envy them? It’s so 2010 now!!! Wake up!!!
[Reply]
My thoughts are “What does it matter what the version number is?” To me, the features that come available are far more important than the build number… Being human though, we all have to label things… Chairs, tables, lamps… I prefer calling them “those thingies over in the corner!” In all seriousness, it doesn’t really matter if it’s 2.3 or 3.0. We’ve seen the Android team do some crazy amazing things in-between small build numbers. 2.1 -> 2.2 is a prime example. Speculation on what the build number is, undermines the capabilities that could come out of the next release whether major or minor.
Just my $0.02… take it or leave it!
[Reply]